Technical articles on inflatable decoys, signature management, mobile hangars and aerostats — written for procurement and engineering teams.
Both give you an eye in the air. They differ in endurance, coverage, cost per hour and how much of your manpower they consume. A short comparison for planning fixed-site surveillance.
Read articleA 40-metre clear-span hangar that arrives in crates and stands in days changes what an austere airfield can support. Here is what to plan for — span, anchoring, pressure control and power.
Read articleA convincing tank decoy is not simply a tank-shaped balloon. Hull angles, road-wheel spacing, turret overhang and barrel length all have to match — and each of them changes how the target reads to a different sensor.
Read articleA radar decoy is judged by what it returns, not by how it looks. This note explains the three figures worth asking for in a tender, and why a single "reflectivity" number is never enough.
Read articleReconnaissance now fuses radar, infrared and optical imagery within minutes. A decoy only works if it survives all three at once — here is how a modern inflatable target is engineered to do that.
Read articleTell us which vehicles, aircraft or radar sets you need to protect and we will return a configuration, a lead time and an export quotation.
